45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
#44571
01/12/2009 7:33 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 154
Is that a cub
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 154 |
So... I am looking to get a big boomer revolver and had my mind set on a 10" BFR in 45-70. That was before I had the opportunity to buy a 10" BFR in 500 S&W Mag for $475. It's in mint condition and has only had 5 round through it. Owners out of work and needs cash now. So do I buy the 500 or wait for the 45-70. Anybody have experience with the BFR??? Caliber comparisons??? This would be my Africa big 5 gun if my dreams come true someday.
PS... The new job at Cabela's is AMAZING!!!
What part of "shall not be infringed" do they not understand
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Is that a cub]
#44572
01/12/2009 11:17 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375
Dan B.
Distinguished Expert
|
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375 |
........and has only had 5 round through it.......... There's a reason for that...that model gun in that caliber was the absolute worst firearm I have ever had the displeasure of shooting!! And there are several of this board that will back me up on that as they were at my range on the same day and shot the same gun. That's all I have to add.....
Exodus 20:5-11 Matthew 5:18 Revelation 22:14
ISPBS--Expert Level
Please don't use e-mail, contact me w/ PM.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Dan B.]
#44574
01/12/2009 11:22 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655
wapitirod
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655 |
The 45-70 isn't any better if you stoke it up, I had mine running 440gr cast performance bullets out at 1600+ and it hurt but it was a shooter and very well built. The one thing to consider with the 45-70 is that with hot loads you'll have a problem stopping crimp jump, 45-70 brass is thin by design and won't hold a crimp which is why I finally gave up and only shot hard cast. The two are very similiar ballisticly so if a BFR is what you want and unless your just dying for the 45-70 I'd jump on the 500 for that price. If you do go with the 45 cal either get the extra cylinder in 450 or just buy the 450, the brass is heavier and will help with the crimp problem.
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. John Wayne-The Shootist
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: wapitirod]
#44581
01/12/2009 11:44 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 427
Recoil
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 427 |
That's a good price for that .500 S&W BFR. I would go for that. I have a .500 S&W BFR 7.5". I like it. It is very accurate. It does get your attention when you squeeze off a shot but it is not that bad. I have lots of big boomers anyway so it fails to intimidate me. Be mindful of your trigger finger and the trigger guard. It used to like to shave some skin off until I moved my hand further down on the grip. I have not had any problems since.
Recoil
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Recoil]
#44582
01/12/2009 11:49 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 813
Jeremy
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 813 |
I am glad this came up. I would still like to hear something on the 30-30 BFR. I have tossed around getting one for deer but still haven't heard anything on it.
Smith and Wesson 629 PC Magnum Hunter
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Jeremy]
#44583
01/12/2009 12:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 300
MS Hitman
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 300 |
Can't be any worse than the DMAX chambered for .50 Alaskan I shot May before last. If you want it, I say go for it.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: MS Hitman]
#44584
01/12/2009 12:26 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 435
BINGO
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 435 |
Lordy that just oozes testosterone! Good deal too. Better grips could help manage that recoil.
Last edited by BINGO; 01/12/2009 12:29 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: BINGO]
#44585
01/12/2009 1:28 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,725
500WE
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,725 |
Dan B., Was it "...the worst firearm..." because of recoil, or because of accuracy ? Thanks.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: 500WE]
#44595
01/12/2009 5:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
pab1
Distinguished Expert
|
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461 |
The rubber grips on a BFR seem to magnify recoil. I put SBH grip panels on my .454 BFR and it made a huge improvement.
Experience is the best teacher, hunger good sauce. Osborne Russell Journal of a Trapper
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: pab1]
#44599
01/12/2009 8:02 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 435
BINGO
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 435 |
If you like wood grips. Herret used to catalog one called the Single Action Trooper. It fills in behind the trigger guard but will leave the back strap open if you like. It's no longer cataloged but they will still make it for you.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: BINGO]
#44620
01/12/2009 11:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655
wapitirod
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655 |
whatever you do unless you have gigantic hands don't buy the wood grips magnum research offers for the BFR, they are way oversized and for me even with fairly large hands I never felt in control of the gun.
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. John Wayne-The Shootist
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: 500WE]
#44629
01/13/2009 12:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375
Dan B.
Distinguished Expert
|
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375 |
Dan B., Was it "...the worst firearm..." because of recoil, or because of accuracy ? Thanks. The recoil was horrific!! Accuracy....could not determine since the iron signts could not maintain their position between shots. The elevation screw moved w/ EVERY shot.
Exodus 20:5-11 Matthew 5:18 Revelation 22:14
ISPBS--Expert Level
Please don't use e-mail, contact me w/ PM.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Dan B.]
#44665
01/13/2009 3:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,704
Tigger
Distinguished Expert
|
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,704 |
Dan B., Was it "...the worst firearm..." because of recoil, or because of accuracy ? Thanks. The recoil was horrific!! Accuracy....could not determine since the iron signts could not maintain their position between shots. The elevation screw moved w/ EVERY shot. YUP, I was there that day. I shot 5 rounds thru the gun and thought if this is what the 500 Short & Weak is like I want nothing to do with it. It was short on niceness and weakened my hands. The hard rubber grips tried to tear up my hands and the recoil was sharp and abrupt. I have had lots of experienc with heavy recoil, but this was just abuse. Each time I would pull the trigger the bullet would strike the ground a little further out. The recoil was backing out the rear sight screw. I was glad Gerry was there with his S&W 500. I shot it and the recoil was nothing like the BFR. I liked it so much I shot 20 rounds thru it. Then eventually got one of my own.
NRA Life Member
** NEVER! Moon a Werewolf!!**
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Tigger]
#44674
01/13/2009 4:57 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757
cottonstalk
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757 |
For me hearing Dan B and Tigger complain about recoil scares me!I know if I ever run into one I'll never shoot it.
"If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence,try orderin' someone else's dog around" unknown cowboy
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: BINGO]
#44675
01/13/2009 4:59 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 976
doc with a glock
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 976 |
Cub,
I have a BFR in 500 S&W, 6" barrel, an RSR exclusive. I shoot a Lee cast 440, actual wt. is 465 gr. with my allow and gas check at approx. 1400 fps. The gun and load are very accurate with 5 shot groups @ 50 yds approx 1.5" and 100 yd groups approx 2.5", when I do my part. You know it is goin' off; however, the recoil is tolerable. I have the standard issue rubber grips, no porting, and a 4x Leupold scope. Additionally, I have a BFR in 444 Marlin, 460 S&W, and 30-30. Haven't had time to work extensively with those yet. You know, work gettin' in the way and all.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: doc with a glock]
#44685
01/13/2009 1:08 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 813
Jeremy
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 813 |
Doc with a glock, I would like to hear about the 30-30 sometime if you get the chance. I like the idea of a 30-30 revolver for deep woods huntn. I just haven't heard much on them.
Smith and Wesson 629 PC Magnum Hunter
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Jeremy]
#45523
01/22/2009 5:38 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 976
doc with a glock
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 976 |
Jeremy,
I am in the process of rechambering to 30-30 Ackley. Will let you know in another thread how it goes.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Tigger]
#45980
01/29/2009 1:37 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,280
Sawfish
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,280 |
[/quote]I was glad Gerry was there with his S&W 500. I shot it and the recoil was nothing like the BFR.[/quote]
The X Frame guns come with a muzzle brake. It has to be added to the BFR. My 45/70 BFR was customized by MagNaPort, the barrel was ported with dual trapezoid ports and a larger port on the top. Ken Kelley referred to it as their "Linebaugh porting". The gun is very manageable, and as big bores go, is not unpleasant to shoot. Even with 405 gr. bullets. I have not had a problem with either cast or jacketed bullets jumping crimp, but I use the Redding Profile Crimp Die which might be the difference.
Good Shooting Makes Good Hunting Patron Member NRA; Life Member RMEF, SCI, NSRPA, CRPA: Member, FTRF, HHI #7108, CBA
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Is that a cub]
#45981
01/29/2009 2:14 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212
Bullelk Hunter
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212 |
Try to understand my next statelment--I will never ever shoot another BFR in 500S&W again! It took me an hour to get over the flinch it left in my brain! My 4" M629 and 285's recoils more than my S$W 500. I am not recoil shy. I shoot a 15" Braked 416 Rigby and a 15" 375H&H. Recoil is not in the same league and performance blows them away--400g Grand Slam at 2450fps from a short gun is no small feat, and it don't hurt nearly as much as that BFR. As far as I'm concerned the M500 is just dog nuts fantastic! They did a fantastic job with the brake! My small hands cannot control the recoil of the BFR 500.
BullElk Hunter (Gerry)HHI #2933 And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, whom shall I send and who will go for us? And I said: Here am I, send me!(Is. 6:8)
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Bullelk Hunter]
#45987
01/29/2009 2:49 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,331
TCTex.
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,331 |
Is the price of ammo even a consideration?
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: TCTex.]
#46005
01/29/2009 11:28 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836 |
I have shot the .45/70 BFR with a ten-inch barrel quite extensively, stoked with 400 grain bullets at a touch over 1,600 fps and I personally don't find it objectionable. It's a HUGE revolver and the way it's designed seems to negate recoil quite a bit. I find the various .475 Linebaughs I have shot to kick harder -- smaller, lighter guns.
Every BFR I have shot has been very accurate and IMHO, there is no better bang-for-the-buck big-bore revolver available.
That is a smokin' deal for that .500, and if you are a handloader, I say go for it. You don't have to load them so hot -- really, you don't. Remember, at the end of the day, one will put a 1/2-inch hole through an animal, while the other will merely make a .458-caliber hole.......
That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it!
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Whitworth]
#46007
01/29/2009 11:50 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 427
Recoil
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 427 |
I have a 500 S&W BFR with a 7.5" smoothe holeless tube and it is not for the faint of heart. It had a habit of shaving skin off of my trigger finger which was not very helpful to my concentration. Anyway, I started holding it further down the grip and that problem went away. I like to shoot it with a baseball cap on. That way when it starts to tip my hat I know I need to get more serious with my hold. Darn accurate handgun!
Recoil
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Is that a cub]
#46018
01/29/2009 4:19 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 194
TonyV
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 194 |
Hey I love my BFR 7 1/2" 500 ! I shoot 460 gr hard cast 34 gr Lil Gun , shoots flat enough to take 200 - 250 yd shots on whitetail , recoil is healthy so I wear a shooting glove at the range and It feels like a 22 when you squeeze the trigger with a deer in the scope ! If the recoil bothers you shoot the light bullets ( 275 - 325 gr ) they don't kick at all ! I personally would not buy the 10", I don't think you gain enough in sight picture or velocity or added weight to worry about. You can pick a BFR in 500 on Gunbroker for about $550.00
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: TonyV]
#46042
01/30/2009 12:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212
Bullelk Hunter
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212 |
Hey Tony, you have a wonderful imagination!!! Like a 22? maybe a 22 mm anti-tank gun!
BullElk Hunter (Gerry)HHI #2933 And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, whom shall I send and who will go for us? And I said: Here am I, send me!(Is. 6:8)
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Bullelk Hunter]
#46049
01/30/2009 1:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 24
mike1227
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 24 |
I have ben reading the posts you guys have been layng out and I think a lesser man would be intimidated of the New 500 BFR I just purchased. I have not received it yet, so obviously I have not shot it.
I did put new Hogue grips on it at the gun store. I know my FA 454 with stout loads and non magnaport did not phase me. I really am not prone to recoil fear. I believe it's due to the fact that I concentrate so much on my target.
However, I am starting to feel a little hesitant of pulling that trigger for the first time after reading some of these post. Wholly crap, worse than a 416 Rigby and 375 H&H?
I guess I will have to see what she's like and then adapt and innovate if the recoil is that stout. Actually I'm kind of getting "gun horny" just thinking what it will be like.
I'll bring along an Orthopedist and Plastic's man to the range just in case things get nasty.
Last edited by mike1227; 01/30/2009 1:40 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: mike1227]
#46068
01/30/2009 5:33 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 976
doc with a glock
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 976 |
Mike,
With a "proper" grip, allowing the gun to "roll" back in the hand, the way Col. Colt designed the '73, and most of that gun's progeny, it is no problem. Not a man or women for that matter, on this list, can hold one of 'em down. In fact, don't. If shot properly, even the hot Hornady 500gr. loads are OK. PS: Proper grip doesn't mean "limp wrist." If you do that, the plastics guy will need to remove the front sight and forend of the barrel from your forehead.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: mike1227]
#46079
01/30/2009 10:21 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375
Dan B.
Distinguished Expert
|
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375 |
However, I am starting to feel a little hesitant of pulling that trigger for the first time after reading some of these post. Wholly crap, worse than a 416 Rigby and 375 H&H?
Mike...a year after shooting the BFR in .500 I was ripping rounds from BEH's .416 Rigby. The Rigby was a handfun but NOTHING like the BFR. The BFR literally took me back a step w/ each shot...I'm not exactly petite and I know how to shoot big bore revolvers. I know that I'd never shoot it again.
Exodus 20:5-11 Matthew 5:18 Revelation 22:14
ISPBS--Expert Level
Please don't use e-mail, contact me w/ PM.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Dan B.]
#46080
01/30/2009 11:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836 |
The rifle is supported by the whole body, and the handgun is wrestled with only your two arms. I have owned (still own some) a .375 H&H, a .416 Rem, a .458 win mag, a .458 Lott, and a .450 Ackley and in my opinion, the big handguns are harder to master than the big rifles. Just be glad no one builds a .500 Smith in a DA revolver! LOL!
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Whitworth]
#46081
01/30/2009 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375
Dan B.
Distinguished Expert
|
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375 |
Just be glad no one builds a .500 Smith in a DA revolver! LOL! The Smith X frames are DA.
Exodus 20:5-11 Matthew 5:18 Revelation 22:14
ISPBS--Expert Level
Please don't use e-mail, contact me w/ PM.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Dan B.]
#46082
01/30/2009 12:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836 |
I know that, but I meant something a bit lighter, smaller, and without a compensator. I should have clarified!
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Whitworth]
#46089
01/30/2009 4:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655
wapitirod
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655 |
I know that, but I meant something a bit lighter, smaller, and without a compensator. I should have clarified! They do, I don't see it in his current catalog but Reeder builds the 500S&W, 475 Maximum and the big boy of the bunch the 500 Linebaugh Maximum on a stretch frame Ruger Blackhawk. The gun weighs just a little more than a normal big bore conversion and you get the single action recoil. He may have dropped it because of too many emergency room visits for guys with bigger ego's than wrists. John Linebaugh was doing the same on the 357MAX frames but I heard he stopped because of frame failures, Reeder was using a special frame said to be stronger than the Ruger.
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. John Wayne-The Shootist
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: wapitirod]
#46244
02/01/2009 4:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 145
PistolHNTR
member
|
member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 145 |
for what it is worth I have two bfrs. 500 and 45/70. Both guns are set up identical, except the 500 is 7.5" and the 45/70 is 10". I used the 500 in africa to harvest several animals. If i had to do it over i would have used the 45/70. The velocity i get with it is much better and recoil is half. Not sure why. I get 1700+ with barnes xxx 300's and 1950 with the x 250 in the 45/70. Recoil is not to bad. The Bfr 500 wtih barnes 275 x and xtp 350's kick like hell in comparison at less than 1700 fps. I shoot a 500 linebaugh and 500 WE among other big bores. The 500 bfr is worse than my 4 3/4" WE in recoil. The 45/70 will do anything the 500 can with less recoil. Both of my revolvers will better 2" groups at 100 if i do my part. My vote is 45/70 hands down for power and shootability. Plus bullet selection is much better than the 500. My 3 cents.
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Whitworth]
#46257
02/01/2009 6:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212
Bullelk Hunter
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212 |
Whitworth, my Rigby and H&H are 15" Custom Encore barrels!! .416 Rigby in a rifle with a brake is a pussy cat.
BullElk Hunter (Gerry)HHI #2933 And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, whom shall I send and who will go for us? And I said: Here am I, send me!(Is. 6:8)
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Bullelk Hunter]
#46312
02/02/2009 12:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836 |
Whitworth, my Rigby and H&H are 15" Custom Encore barrels!! .416 Rigby in a rifle with a brake is a pussy cat. Yikes! What kind of velocity do you get with the .416 with 400 grain pills? My .416 Rem weighs 8-lbs and has no brake, and it will get your attention off the bench -- but who shoots big-bores off the bench more than they have to?? My .450 Ackley is still doing time in gunsmith prison and it too will weigh in right around 8-lbs. I suspect it won't be too pleasant to shoot either! LOL!
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Whitworth]
#46341
02/02/2009 11:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212
Bullelk Hunter
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,212 |
2300fps with 400's, 2450 with 350 TSX!! Real expensive to shoot though. 105gr of pwder and bulet that costs mucho and teh brass is ~$2 each. Such a deal for fun!!
BullElk Hunter (Gerry)HHI #2933 And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, whom shall I send and who will go for us? And I said: Here am I, send me!(Is. 6:8)
|
|
|
Re: 45-70 or 500 S&W Magnum
[Re: Bullelk Hunter]
#46344
02/03/2009 1:13 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836 |
That's smokin'! That's got to get your attention even with the brake!
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
57
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|