Handgunhunt

A "tweener"?

Posted By: TM

A "tweener"? - 04/08/2015 4:29 PM

Is the .480 Ruger in between the .44 Magnum and .454 Casull in regards to "power"? A little more than 1 and a little less that the other??
Posted By: s4s4u

Re: A "tweener"? - 04/08/2015 4:35 PM

You could say that, but I would rate it much closer to the 454 than the 44 when it comes to "power".
Posted By: Chance Weldon

Re: A "tweener"? - 04/08/2015 5:36 PM

Going by the numbers, it seems to fit nicely between the two. Where exactly it stands next to the others depends on the loads you're comparing.
Posted By: 98Redline

Re: A "tweener"? - 04/08/2015 6:11 PM

I would agree with Rod, the 480R is awful close to the 454 when you start to look at top end loads.
Posted By: Whitworth

Re: A "tweener"? - 04/08/2015 6:37 PM

The .454 can be loaded to much higher pressures than the .480 (65k vs 48k). On paper the .454 will look more impressive because of this factor. I personally feel that muzzle energy figures are a poor way to measure lethality. Ruger's big mistake at the outset was to release the .480 with such lukewarm loads. Loaded properly, the.480 is a pretty big hammer in its own right. I wouldn't sandwich it it between the .44 and .454.
Posted By: Gregg Richter

Re: A "tweener"? - 04/09/2015 2:43 AM

 Originally Posted By: Whitworth
The .454 can be loaded to much higher pressures than the .480 (65k vs 48k). On paper the .454 will look more impressive because of this factor. I personally feel that muzzle energy figures are a poor way to measure lethality. Ruger's big mistake at the outset was to release the .480 with such lukewarm loads. Loaded properly, the.480 is a pretty big hammer in its own right. I wouldn't sandwich it it between the .44 and .454.


So the inevitable Q is where would you "sandwich it?"

I would say 'tween the .454 and the .475 L.

;\)


Posted By: dhom

Re: A "tweener"? - 04/09/2015 9:33 AM

 Originally Posted By: Gregg Richter
 Originally Posted By: Whitworth
The .454 can be loaded to much higher pressures than the .480 (65k vs 48k). On paper the .454 will look more impressive because of this factor. I personally feel that muzzle energy figures are a poor way to measure lethality. Ruger's big mistake at the outset was to release the .480 with such lukewarm loads. Loaded properly, the.480 is a pretty big hammer in its own right. I wouldn't sandwich it it between the .44 and .454.


So the inevitable Q is where would you "sandwich it?"

I would say 'tween the .454 and the .475 L.

;\)


X2
Posted By: FAH

Re: A "tweener"? - 04/09/2015 4:44 PM

I agree, in my experience its 'tween the .454 and .475 L.
Posted By: nockhunter

Re: A "tweener"? - 05/15/2015 5:21 AM

I'm waiting for one in a Bisley SBH.

Mike
© 2024 Handgunhunt forums