Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Less powder, equal velocity #88640 06/27/2011 4:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 107
Charlie SA Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 107
Interesting article by John Taffin in the last American Handgunner. “Seatem Deep and Cheap”. Basically, loading (tested .44 Special/.44 Magnum and .45 Colt) with less powder and seating the bullet to the outer band resulted in approximately the same velocity, less recoil and greater accuracy then with more powder and normal seating depth. This was with 240 grain and 255 grain SWC type bullets and velocities around 850 fps. Anyone try this? Would it hold true with higher velocities?

Re: Less powder, equal velocity [Re: Charlie SA] #88650 06/27/2011 8:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 533
Dave Tarbell Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 533
I guess it makes some sense since seating them deeper would up the presure,if its the same speed recoil should be the same,dont know where the increased accuracy would come from.Dont think Id mess with it tho,just my opinion and Im not sure what thats worth.


Dave Tarbell
Re: Less powder, equal velocity [Re: Dave Tarbell] #88651 06/27/2011 8:17 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 88
Charlie Young Offline
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 88
Deep seating bullets over a "normal" charge of powder sounds like a recipe for disaster. Pressures spike as the deep seated bullet lessens the internal area of the case. I wouldn't advise anyone to do this. Besides, that's why there are reloading manuals with proven loads.


NRA Benefactor life member
Re: Less powder, equal velocity [Re: Charlie Young] #88652 06/27/2011 8:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 107
Charlie SA Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 107
A clarification, I don't reload and don't intend to start. With velocities quoted in the 800-850 range I tended to believe he was talking about mild loads nowhere near max. Also noted was for deep seating the powder was reduced. Probably a better question may have been did anyone else read the article?
Charlie

Re: Less powder, equal velocity [Re: Charlie SA] #88655 06/27/2011 10:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 88
Charlie Young Offline
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 88
No, I haven't read the article. My reply was based on your question of higher velocity. I can understand John Taffin wanting to shoot with less recoil. He has bad wrists from too many years of shooting big booming handguns. Unfortunately, father time catches up with all of us.


NRA Benefactor life member
Re: Less powder, equal velocity [Re: Charlie SA] #88657 06/27/2011 11:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 107
Charlie SA Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 107
Yeah, I've read his comments about bad wrists when it comes to heavy loads. His focus in the article was really about how accurate he found the deep seated loads and getting 100+ more loads from a pound of powder, that is talking about mild loads.
In rethinking what was said in the article there probably isn't room to increase the the powder from what he stated AND deep seat the bullet, at least to depth he mentioned.
Anyway it isn't something I would try as again, I don't reload.
Charlie

Re: Less powder, equal velocity [Re: Charlie SA] #88660 06/28/2011 1:14 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,331
TCTex. Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,331
This is also coming from the guy that ordered a matching set of Ruger SBH’s with 5&7/8ths, 7.5, and a 10in barrels in 44 Sp from the factory. I know what he is shooting in them and it isn’t your standard 44sp loads.


Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb
Benjamin Franklin

Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 48 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3