10" Contender Octagon question
#97753
12/12/2011 3:39 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23
Mn Handgunner
OP
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23 |
Hey guy's I was snooping around trying to find out what my 10" tender octagon barrel would be worth and I found a place that list a type II... Now whats difference and how do you tell a type I from a type II?
I'd like to sell or trade off my 10" octagon .22 LR and fund the purchase of a 10" .223 and have no idea what mine is worth. It's un scoped with adjustable iron sights.
Minnesota Handgunner,
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: Mn Handgunner]
#97755
12/12/2011 3:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608 |
Depending on condition, used tubes fetch around $150 + or -.
Rod, too.
Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: s4s4u]
#97798
12/12/2011 9:55 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91
chiefs50
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91 |
I've seen them run from $110 to $150. Did you check over on the Specialty Pistols forum?
CSM, Retired I believe in science and reason, not some invisible guy in the sky.
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: chiefs50]
#97834
12/13/2011 3:23 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434
H2OBUG
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434 |
If it jams force it! If it breaks it needed replacing anyway.
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: H2OBUG]
#97841
12/13/2011 4:02 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23
Mn Handgunner
OP
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23 |
Thanks guy's but whats the difference between a type I and a type II?????
Minnesota Handgunner,
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: Mn Handgunner]
#97846
12/13/2011 4:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608 |
Thanks guy's but whats the difference between a type I and a type II????? Age? There are eras in the T/C lineage where significant changes took place. We went from flat lug to stepped lug, from solid to split locking bolts, from hard to easy open, etc. There were even ejectors as well as extractors at one time. Not sure which would be considered type I or II, but neither is really worth any more than any other as far as value, other than what the buyer beholds.
Rod, too.
Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: s4s4u]
#97864
12/13/2011 2:34 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91
chiefs50
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91 |
Here is the information you need: Type I Term used to describe the very earliest of production Contender barrels (early 1967 to late 1967). These barrel are easily spotted by their "one line" company address and caliber designations. All Type I barrels are octagonal, have flat bottomed lugs, allen screw bolt retention and short style rear sights. To date, only six calibers are known to exist in this barrel type. They are 22LR, 22WRM, 22 Jet, 22 Hornet, 38 Special, and 357 Magnum. Type I barrels are known to exist in both 10 and 8 3/4 inch barrel lengths. Type II Designation given to the second style of octagonal Contender barrels (late 1967 to 1972). These barrels may be easily recognized by their two line address and caliber designations. Of further importance is the punctuation used between the "N" and the "H" used to abbreviate the words New Hampshire; both are followed by a period. (example - Rochester, N. H.). Type II barrels are also recognized by their flat bottomed lugs, allen screw bolt retention and short rear sights. Type II barrels exist in three lengths, 10 inch, 8 3/4 inch and 6 inch. These may also be found as "scope model" variations (w/o front sights). The largest selection of calibers exist within the Type II classification including all of the original 17 caliber offerings. There are actually five types. Types I thru V. Information on other types can be found at: http://specialtypistols.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/387102585/m/1041006425Mike
Last edited by chiefs50; 12/13/2011 11:37 PM.
CSM, Retired I believe in science and reason, not some invisible guy in the sky.
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: chiefs50]
#97950
12/14/2011 7:31 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23
Mn Handgunner
OP
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23 |
chiefs50, Thank you for the information. I know it doesn't matter much on price for the barrel,i was just wondering what i had and how to tell.
Minnesota Handgunner,
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: chiefs50]
#97951
12/14/2011 7:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u
Shootist
|
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608 |
Rod, too.
Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: s4s4u]
#97952
12/14/2011 8:21 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91
chiefs50
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91 |
You're welcome. Glad I could be of service. I'm not sure who originally put that information together. I know that whenever I've needed information there was always someone willing to share their expertise with me. Forums like these are great, aren't they?
Mike
CSM, Retired I believe in science and reason, not some invisible guy in the sky.
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: chiefs50]
#97960
12/14/2011 11:08 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23
Mn Handgunner
OP
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23 |
They sure are a world of information when your new to things and try'n to learn. BTW Mike,you have a PM also.
Minnesota Handgunner,
|
|
|
Re: 10" Contender Octagon question
[Re: Mn Handgunner]
#98329
12/20/2011 12:14 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 43
gemihur
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 43 |
A world of trivia exists within the history of the T/C contender developement. Many of us appreciate it. Thanks, Mike! Jimmy
Think twice, shoot once.
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
26
guests, and 2
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|