Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
heavy bullets #111998 07/03/2012 2:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 345
Festus Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 345
I tried shooting heavy cast out of my 44 but they shot too high.
I was shooting 262 gr with 4227

I bottomed out the rear sight.
I hate to change the front (since I just had a hi viz installed.

Would a powder change possibly lower point of impact?

Re: heavy bullets [Re: Festus] #112006 07/03/2012 3:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757
cottonstalk Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757
Maybe Festus,any idea what your velocity is with 4227?


"If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence,try orderin' someone else's dog around" unknown cowboy
Re: heavy bullets [Re: Festus] #112008 07/03/2012 3:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,037
wtroper Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,037
I would expect that an increase in velocity might lower the the point of impact. I do not know what velocity that you are getting or what you want. If you have some 2400 try it. It is pretty forgiving in loading either relatively light loads or those that are heavier.


It's more important where you hit 'em, than what you hit 'em with.
Re: heavy bullets [Re: wtroper] #112014 07/03/2012 4:15 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
RioHondoHank Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
Actually an increase in velocity will raise the point of impact on a revolver. More velocity means more recoil and the point of impact is largely determined by how much the gun recoils before the bullet exits the barrel. That is why he is experiancing a higher point of impact with a heavier bullet. All things being equal a heavier bullet means more recoil.

I am refurring here to what I call intial recoil, that is the recoil caused by the movement of the bullet until it exits the barrel. As I understand it most of felt recoil occurs after the bullet leaves the barrel by the excaping gas. A movement of only a fraction of a degree before the bullet exits the barrel can change the point of impact by several inches.

Last edited by RioHondoHank; 07/03/2012 4:34 PM.

Hank

Re: heavy bullets [Re: RioHondoHank] #112016 07/03/2012 4:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 41
anachronism Offline
newbie
Offline
newbie
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 41
I take it this didn't start until after you changed the front sight? How did it shoot before? Did you install matching front & rear sights, or just the front one? 262 gr isn't really a heavyweight for a 44 magnum

Re: heavy bullets [Re: anachronism] #112020 07/03/2012 4:38 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
RioHondoHank Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: anachronism
262 gr isn't really a heavyweight for a 44 magnum


Of course it is relative, had he been shooting as 180 gr before 262 would be enough heavier to change his POI.


Hank

Re: heavy bullets [Re: RioHondoHank] #112023 07/03/2012 4:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
 Originally Posted By: RioHondoHank
 Originally Posted By: anachronism
262 gr isn't really a heavyweight for a 44 magnum


Of course it is relative, had he been shooting as 180 gr before 262 would be enough heavier to change his POI.


Well compared to the old standard 240 grain loads.


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: heavy bullets [Re: Whitworth] #112026 07/03/2012 5:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
RioHondoHank Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: Whitworth
 Originally Posted By: RioHondoHank
 Originally Posted By: anachronism
262 gr isn't really a heavyweight for a 44 magnum


Of course it is relative, had he been shooting as 180 gr before 262 would be enough heavier to change his POI.


Well compared to the old standard 240 grain loads.


We need more info from Festus. We do know that he put a new front sight and it was perhaps shorter than the orginal and was still ok for lighter bullets.

Last edited by RioHondoHank; 07/03/2012 5:02 PM.

Hank

Re: heavy bullets [Re: Whitworth] #112027 07/03/2012 5:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,037
wtroper Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,037
Hank,

I disagree with you. My experience is lighter and/or faster bullets strike lower and heavier/slower bullets stike higher from a revolver. This is opposite of what I expect from a rifle.


It's more important where you hit 'em, than what you hit 'em with.
Re: heavy bullets [Re: RioHondoHank] #112030 07/03/2012 5:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097
jwp475 Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097


IME faster bullets shoot lower than slower bullets. Case in point a 440 grain at 950 FPS shoots high in my FA-83 500 JRH, so high in fact that I do not have enough sight adjustment to compensate. Yet the same bullet @ 1380 FPS sights in



Re: heavy bullets [Re: wtroper] #112032 07/03/2012 5:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
RioHondoHank Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: wtroper
Hank,

I disagree with you. My experience is lighter and/or faster bullets strike lower and heavier/slower bullets stike higher from a revolver. This is opposite of what I expect from a rifle.


You misunderstood what I mean't. Of course a lighter bullet will strike lower even though it is faster. What I mean't and it has been my experiance that for the same bullet weight increasing the velocity raises the POI. Others may have a different experiance but that is my observation.

Of course there are all sorts of variables that enter in to what happens, like a faster or slower burning powder may cause the intial recoil (my term) to react with the gun differently.

Last edited by RioHondoHank; 07/03/2012 5:29 PM.

Hank

Re: heavy bullets [Re: RioHondoHank] #112037 07/03/2012 5:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097
jwp475 Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097


In my experience a heavy bullet that is slower shoots higher than one that is 300 to 400 FPS faster. The slower bullet has longer barrel time

Re: heavy bullets [Re: jwp475] #112044 07/03/2012 6:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
Yea, it is a combination of dwell time in the barrel and bullet weight. The shooter's grip has a lot to do with it as well. Less time in the tube = less time for muzzle rise to affect it, which is determined by recoil, which is dependant upon bullet weight and velocity. If you play around with enough variables you will find the one that works.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: heavy bullets [Re: s4s4u] #112093 07/03/2012 11:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655
wapitirod Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655
there is another option, Ruger uses two different heights of rear sights, if you have the taller of the two you can go to the lower one. The other option is if there is room use a square needle file and deepen the notch.


I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. John Wayne-The Shootist


Re: heavy bullets [Re: jwp475] #112395 07/06/2012 2:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 345
Festus Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 345
To clarify I had magnaport install a hi-viz FS
It appears to be the same or a little taller than the original.
But I dont have the old one to compare as it was milled off.

I wasshooting a moderate load

Cast performance 262 with 22.5 gr of IMR4227
At 40 yds it shot 24-30inches high
I had my cousin shoot to make sure it want me and he did about the same.
I shot factory loaded 250 winchester sivertips(prior to new FO sight) and didnt have a problem.
They shot high but not that high.

Anyway I like large meplat heavy cast, but not if I have to aim in the dirt in fromt of the deer.
Once it cools down Im going to test some more.

Re: heavy bullets [Re: Festus] #112406 07/06/2012 5:24 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 270
Randominator Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 270
The faster I push the same bullet out of a revolver, the lower the point of impact will be. The slower the bullet, the more time in the barrel, barrel is higher in recoil, higher impact. This has been true for every handgun that I load for. Just my observations.

Try some AA#9. I get good velocity in a 44 mag using it.


NRA Life Member
HHI Member
VHA Member

"get busy living, or get busy dying"
Re: heavy bullets [Re: jwp475] #112493 07/07/2012 4:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 463
Boot Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 463
Cant offer anything on handloads, but with factory ammo, my 44 hits alot higher with 300gr slugs, than with 240's. I had to bottom out the rear sight to get close with the 300's.


Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 110 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3