Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
WFN's #114490 07/29/2012 4:28 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
What do you think?

200 yards

Last edited by Frank1; 07/29/2012 4:28 PM.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114491 07/29/2012 4:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 241
Grendel Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 241
I'll stay @ 500 yards! 200 yards is too scary!


"Aim small, miss small"
Re: WFN's [Re: Grendel] #114492 07/29/2012 4:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
KRal Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
Very fine shoot'n Frank1! What's the particulars on caliber, load, scope and such?


It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.
Re: WFN's [Re: KRal] #114495 07/29/2012 5:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
KRal:
 Quote:
Very fine shoot'n Frank1! What's the particulars on caliber, load, scope and such?


That's a BFR 475 with Leupold 2X. The load is LBT 420 grain WFN, 25.3 grains W296, Fed155 primer & Hornady brass.

Re: WFN's [Re: Grendel] #114496 07/29/2012 5:21 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Grendel:
 Quote:
I'll stay @ 500 yards! 200 yards is too scary!


I'll be clicking out to 500 soon. Don't stay there too long.

\:D

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114500 07/29/2012 5:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,755
johnwilliams Offline
Shooting Master
Offline
Shooting Master
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,755
impressive group at 200!


H.H.I.#8190 Colossians 1:17 And He is before all things,and by Him all things consist!
Re: WFN's [Re: johnwilliams] #114501 07/29/2012 5:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,155
Gregg Richter Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,155
 Originally Posted By: johnwilliams
impressive group at 200!


Boy, I'll say that's for sure!







Re: WFN's [Re: Gregg Richter] #114510 07/29/2012 6:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
jamesfromjersey Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
MAN O MAN THAT IS ONE DAMM GOOD GROUP FOR A REVOLVER AT 200 YARDS
No need for you to buy a single shot. Good for you, James
PS and you did with a 2X no less.....

Last edited by jamesfromjersey; 07/29/2012 6:40 PM.

Life member-NRA-SCI
Member-HHI #2900-HHASA #067
Colt-Ruger-Freedom Arms-and S&W Collector Assoc.s
"I have more guns then I need but not as many as I want" "Handgun hunters HAVE to be good"
Re: WFN's [Re: Gregg Richter] #114511 07/29/2012 6:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
KRal Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
Frank1, I have to say, that's the first target turrets I've seen on a 2x; that's some fantastic shoot'n!


It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.
Re: WFN's [Re: KRal] #114520 07/29/2012 6:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Nice shooting, Frank! So much for WFNs not flying well!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: WFN's [Re: Whitworth] #114523 07/29/2012 7:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,359
SChunter Offline
Shooting Expert
Offline
Shooting Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,359
That's some FINE shootin'! I want more magnification at 200 - heck, even more at 100!

Very impressive!

Re: WFN's [Re: SChunter] #114529 07/29/2012 8:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
jamesfromjersey Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
 Originally Posted By: SChunter
That's some FINE shootin'! I want more magnification at 200 - heck, even more at 100!

Very impressive!




SC, I agree about the magnification. You know what the crosshair would look like on a target like that at 100 yards...
PS- what about the holdover...

Last edited by jamesfromjersey; 07/29/2012 8:07 PM.

Life member-NRA-SCI
Member-HHI #2900-HHASA #067
Colt-Ruger-Freedom Arms-and S&W Collector Assoc.s
"I have more guns then I need but not as many as I want" "Handgun hunters HAVE to be good"
Re: WFN's [Re: jamesfromjersey] #114535 07/29/2012 9:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,331
TCTex. Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,331
I know rifle shooter that can't do that, and like James said, you did it with a revolver!!


Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb
Benjamin Franklin
Re: WFN's [Re: jamesfromjersey] #114537 07/29/2012 9:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097
jwp475 Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097
 Originally Posted By: jamesfromjersey
 Originally Posted By: SChunter
That's some FINE shootin'! I want more magnification at 200 - heck, even more at 100!

Very impressive!




SC, I agree about the magnification. You know what the crosshair would look like on a target like that at 100 yards...
PS- what about the holdover...



Judging from the picture the scope appears to have target turrets and by this reply I'd venture that he is holding the reticule exactly where he wants to hit

 Originally Posted By: Frank1
Grendel:
 Quote:
I'll stay @ 500 yards! 200 yards is too scary!


I'll be clicking out to 500 soon. Don't stay there too long.

\:D

Re: WFN's [Re: TCTex.] #114539 07/29/2012 9:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
jamesfromjersey:
 Quote:
SC, I agree about the magnification. You know what the crosshair would look like on a target like that at 100 yards...
PS- what about the holdover...


Thanks for all the complements guys! There's no holdover. I use come-ups. If it is zeroed at 100, holdover would be 25". I click it additional 6.25 units on the dial. See the numbers on the turret. Clicks are 1/2 moa on the Leupy, so one dial unit is 2 moa. 6.25 units X 2 moa X 2 = 25 inches holdover/come-ups.

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114544 07/29/2012 10:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 533
Dave Tarbell Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 533
Dang Frank that is realfine shooting.


Dave Tarbell
Re: WFN's [Re: Dave Tarbell] #114545 07/29/2012 11:16 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Thanks, Dave.

jwp475:
 Quote:
Judging from the picture the scope appears to have target turrets and by this reply I'd venture that he is holding the reticule exactly where he wants to hit

That's it.

Last edited by Frank1; 07/29/2012 11:20 PM.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114548 07/29/2012 11:42 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 408
Seasons44 Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 408
Very nice shooting, Frank


Simple, Elegant, but always Approachable
Re: WFN's [Re: Seasons44] #114559 07/30/2012 12:58 AM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
C'mon. Where are the critics?

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114563 07/30/2012 1:27 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Originally Posted By: Frank1
C'mon. Where are the critics?


If you tighten it up a bit you might have a decent hunting gun there
;\)


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114570 07/30/2012 2:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 222
wizzard Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 222
 Originally Posted By: Frank1
C'mon. Where are the critics?

That's an ugly grip. lol nice shootin'

Re: WFN's [Re: wizzard] #114573 07/30/2012 3:22 AM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
s4s4u:
 Quote:
If you tighten it up a bit you might have a decent hunting gun there

The problem is all week the wind was blowing R-L. An experienced friend of mine told me when he was shooting competition, sometimes when you aimed at a ram, it would hit the other ram. He was shooting a 44 magnum. I don't know if the guys with contenders have that problem with a faster, pointy bullet, because their targets are always 100 yds or less.

Last edited by Frank1; 07/30/2012 3:23 AM.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114575 07/30/2012 3:27 AM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,625
Raptortrapper Offline
Shooting Master
Offline
Shooting Master
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,625
"He was shooting a 44 magnum"
That's the problem-- once he gets away from the pea shooter he'll be okay!

JUST KIDDIN!!!!

Last edited by raptortrapper; 07/30/2012 3:28 AM.

A lot of people are like a slinky: Not much fun till you push them down the stairs!

Lifetime Member of the NRA! Wish I'd a done it sooner.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114576 07/30/2012 3:31 AM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
wizzard:
 Quote:
That's an ugly grip.


It works. That's the most important part.

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114578 07/30/2012 3:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,155
Gregg Richter Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,155
 Originally Posted By: Frank1
C'mon. Where are the critics?


OK, well... hhmmm....

I guess it is what it is???

LOL!


As for the Target Turrets:



I have 2 sets but only put a set on one of my 4X Leupy handgun scopes for this pic!!!

LOL!

I do not think they are the same as Frank's; but it is what it is!

\:D







Re: WFN's [Re: Gregg Richter] #114599 07/30/2012 11:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
jamesfromjersey Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
Frankie, How much of the target you used is covered by the 2X crosshair at 200 yards???


Life member-NRA-SCI
Member-HHI #2900-HHASA #067
Colt-Ruger-Freedom Arms-and S&W Collector Assoc.s
"I have more guns then I need but not as many as I want" "Handgun hunters HAVE to be good"
Re: WFN's [Re: jamesfromjersey] #114623 07/30/2012 3:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
jamesfromjersey:
 Quote:
Frankie, How much of the target you used is covered by the 2X crosshair at 200 yards???


Very small amount. A duplex reticle is small. I'm going to try a water bottle with it next time. The problem will be seeing the bottle, maybe not.

Last edited by Frank1; 07/30/2012 3:16 PM.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #114666 07/30/2012 8:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
jamesfromjersey Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
Frank, You must have a smaller or custom reticle on your Leupold
2X because I paced off 100 yards and held my 2X Leupold on a similar size target and my duplex reticle covered the target...
Anyway, good shooting. To bad your not in England at the games...


Life member-NRA-SCI
Member-HHI #2900-HHASA #067
Colt-Ruger-Freedom Arms-and S&W Collector Assoc.s
"I have more guns then I need but not as many as I want" "Handgun hunters HAVE to be good"
Re: WFN's [Re: jamesfromjersey] #114676 07/30/2012 11:29 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
james:
 Quote:
Frank, You must have a smaller or custom reticle on your Leupold
2X because I paced off 100 yards and held my 2X Leupold on a similar size target and my duplex reticle covered the target...
Anyway, good shooting. To bad your not in England at the games...


It's original. Did you try adjusting the eyepiece?

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #115186 08/07/2012 3:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 139
Mark Schronce Offline
member
Offline
member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 139
Frank,

very good shooting. I ordered a Stony point target knob for my 2.5 x 8 Leupold. I have not been to the range yet. I sent you a PM. How well does it work? I have a encore 22-250, it is zeroed 1" high at 100 and is dead on at 200yds. I want to see how it will do at longer ranges.

Mark

Re: WFN's [Re: Mark Schronce] #115188 08/07/2012 3:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
The Stoney Point dial works. Mine pulled the elevation adjuster out the scope because of recoil. You will no problem with it with a 22-250.

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #115189 08/07/2012 3:39 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Mark Schronce
 Quote:
I sent you a PM.


Really? I don't have any PM's in my box .

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #115194 08/07/2012 4:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 139
Mark Schronce Offline
member
Offline
member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 139
Frank,

I don't know what happen to the PM, but I have my info. Leupold will put a Elv. target knob for $80. I will try the SP for now, I may send to Leupold this winter.


Mark

Re: WFN's [Re: Mark Schronce] #115197 08/07/2012 4:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
They only do that for 2.5 X 8, not the lower power 2X and 4X. I may look elsewhere for an optic.

Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #115212 08/07/2012 7:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,642
BBwheelgunner Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,642
damn good shooting there.


"If you are going to go through all the trouble to put a hole in something, why not make it a big one?"
Re: WFN's [Re: BBwheelgunner] #115228 08/08/2012 12:47 AM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
BBwheelgunner:
 Quote:
damn good shooting there.

Thanks. I wasn't trying to brag, by the way. I had to do it to prove to the experts that WFN's fly at long range.

Last edited by Frank1; 08/08/2012 12:49 AM.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #115230 08/08/2012 1:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
 Originally Posted By: Frank1
BBwheelgunner:
 Quote:
damn good shooting there.

Thanks. I wasn't trying to brag, by the way. I had to do it to prove to the experts that WFN's fly at long range.


Amen to that, Frank!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: WFN's [Re: Whitworth] #115240 08/08/2012 4:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Whitworth:
 Quote:
Frank:
 Quote:
Thanks. I wasn't trying to brag, by the way. I had to do it to prove to the experts that WFN's fly at long range.



Amen to that, Frank!


Did you hear, the Leupold came apart? I looked at the scope and the elev. turret was gone. There was a big hole on the top. The rest of the scope was fine, just no elevation adjuster. The thing you adjust with a coin was behind me in the dirt.

Last edited by Frank1; 08/08/2012 4:35 AM.
Re: WFN's [Re: Frank1] #115249 08/08/2012 12:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Is it fixable?


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: WFN's [Re: Whitworth] #115257 08/08/2012 3:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
Frank1 Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 214
It pulled the threads. Three threads hold the adjuster in the scope body. The tube may need to be replaced also. What's interesting about the failure is the adjuster needs to be tight and bottomed against the ball. If it starts to give way, or lift, pressure against the ball is reduced, resulting is greater elevation. Holding a setting requires it to hold when it's under great tension internally. Then you add recoil. It's those two things, the internal hold plus recoil versus three aluminum threads.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 110 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3