Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Ruger Alaskan 454 #120461 10/24/2012 10:49 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
Lucien Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
Hello all,

I have been a member sneaking around here but haven't posted in a bit. Guess I didn't have much to say. But, I do now. I recently acquired a brand new ruger alaskan in 454 and I am not sure that I like it. Its not that I think that it totally butt ugly but I would think that it would be without a date at the prom. That aside, I am hearing things about light strikes due to the new position of the transfer bar. Hmmm. I have no issues yet but I have only fired 20 rds of full house 454 through it and 50 45 colts. Is this an issue that I need to keep an eye on?
The cases seem very stiff coming out of the chambers and I know that it is a very high pressure cartridge with a slight bulge to them. Is that normal? Also, I am not recoil sensitive, or I wasn't, until now. This thing hates me as much as my ex wives. Yes, there are more than one.
Finally, what is general opinion on the Alaskan? Are they worthy of high quality defense in Alaska to go along with my double rifle or should I look elsewhere and let this thing go?

Thank you all for the time!
Lucien


Sean R. Kerr
Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: Lucien] #120481 10/25/2012 2:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 222
wizzard Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 222
If you have to use it to protect yourself, chances are you won't remember recoil.
\:\)

Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: wizzard] #120482 10/25/2012 3:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
I like 'em and think they pack a lot of punch in a little package. You don't have to go crazy with heavy loads for them to be effective.


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: Whitworth] #120488 10/25/2012 5:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 605
bfr4570 Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 605
 Originally Posted By: Whitworth
I like 'em and think they pack a lot of punch in a little package. You don't have to go crazy with heavy loads for them to be effective.


Whitt is saying you dont need a heavy load. Must be melowing out some.


THIS SPACE FOR RENT CASH ONLY.
Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: bfr4570] #120489 10/25/2012 6:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
 Originally Posted By: bfr4570
 Originally Posted By: Whitworth
I like 'em and think they pack a lot of punch in a little package. You don't have to go crazy with heavy loads for them to be effective.


Whitt is saying you dont need a heavy load. Must be melowing out some.


Not mellowing -- just being considerate of others!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: Whitworth] #120490 10/25/2012 6:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 605
bfr4570 Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 605
Just trying to get my facts straight
\:\)


THIS SPACE FOR RENT CASH ONLY.
Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: bfr4570] #120518 10/26/2012 1:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
Lucien Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
Are you two related? Kinda like the odd couple here bfr and Whit. LOL. Yeah, I would think that the 454 would work quite well but there is something that I am trying to figure out and have no dies yet so I can't try it out on my own at the moment, and that is can I load heavy 400 grainers in the 454 at modest velocities to not have killer recoil but keep the heavy penetration? I have read the usual internet crap and people say that its too heavy a bullet and others say it is perfect. Any thoughts guys? As always, thanks


Sean R. Kerr
Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: Lucien] #120519 10/26/2012 1:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 293
Muddy Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 293
Ross Seyfried wrote of trying 412 gr. bullets in a heavy loaded 45 Colt and surmised that the bullet was possibly too long for the caliber. He came to that conclusion when the slug did not penetrate as well as he had anticipated. He thought it may have "wobbled more after they hit, reducing penetration". (Guns & Ammo Jan 1995)

Dan

Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: Muddy] #120725 10/29/2012 11:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 493
SBHunter81 Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 493
Can't offer much input on the specifics you mentioned, but I agree that it is an ugly beast :-)


The God who gave us such a beautiful land, wonderful game, and the sport of hunting is worth knowing.
Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: SBHunter81] #121076 11/04/2012 3:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,020
tradmark Offline
Shooting Expert
Offline
Shooting Expert
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,020
I have one and would like another if ya decide ya dont like yours. That said mine is great and im plenty good withit out to 50 yards and just need a diff front sight fir anything further. Ya dont need Huge bellets just a 300 to 360 gr hardcast and use a powder like hs6. Not bad recoil and youll stop anything ya need to provided you do your part

Re: Ruger Alaskan 454 [Re: tradmark] #121882 11/14/2012 12:24 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 76
Damon Offline
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 76
it you dont like it ill give ya 50$ for it


Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 73 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3