Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
4" to 3"??? #140375 01/15/2014 5:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 207
TM Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 207
Probably answered my own question already but, I like the S&W Trail Boss, the 3" .44 magnum. It looks quite packable and handy, and to me it has a certain "cool factor".
I have a 4" M29 I am considering cutting to 3" to basically have the Trail Boss, only in blue finish. I already am thinking this would be a waste of $$ as a 4" is really pretty packable, handy and easy to holster and shoot. As mentioned in post a day or so ago I will only shoot 240 gr. out of it, (as with my SBH). I just think the money could be better spent elsewhere. Any opinions one way or the other??

Re: 4" to 3"??? [Re: TM] #140376 01/15/2014 5:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
I've never found an inch of barrel to be difficult to carry. I would prefer the longer sight radius and higher velocity over a little bit shorter of a holster.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 4" to 3"??? [Re: s4s4u] #140377 01/15/2014 5:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
RioHondoHank Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
I would like a 3 uinch barrel, but I have a 4 inch barrel on my carry gun because if I wish to use it to hunt deer in Oklahoma regs require 4 inch minimum.


Hank

Re: 4" to 3"??? [Re: RioHondoHank] #140379 01/15/2014 6:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 533
Dave Tarbell Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 533
I would think it wouldnt cost much to cut it down but as was said to what purpose an inch shorter wouldnt accomplish anything to the good.


Dave Tarbell
Re: 4" to 3"??? [Re: Dave Tarbell] #140382 01/15/2014 7:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,101
Bearbait in NM Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,101
If you follow along on the Colt, S&W Forums and Gunbroker, you will find that the 3" revolvers are all carrying a very high cool factor, price and desirability right now. For the older models, it seems to be rarity of production. For the newer models, the trend seems to be a little easier for concealed carry, and the speed at which you can "skin" it.

I don't have any 3"ers, but I do have the almost 4ish, and a couple of large frame 2 and change. About the only time I see a difference is in concealed carry, with a high rise type holster. The 4 inch class can be a little harder on getting clearance to the front of the holster compared to the shorter. But even that can be mitigated by a holster that has a bit of swoop to the front. The shorter ones also ride a little better in the vehicle seat. And this is all with strongside carry.

I've got the bug for a 45acp revolver right now, and have decided 4 inch. As Hank noted, I might hunt with it, and 4 inch is common for hunting regs. And I know I can find a holster (or make one) that will make carrying and drawing a snap. If I could afford both, the 3" would be nifty for "those times". With the funds for only one, I feel a 4 has a touch more functionality for me.

Good luck with the decision, and stay out of those 3" revolver threads......;^)

Craig


Northern born and Southern bred
Re: 4" to 3"??? [Re: Bearbait in NM] #140391 01/15/2014 9:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,048
wvhitman Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,048
Ever shoot a 3". Not friendly with full power stuff. If you load down may as well buy a .44 Sp. 4" is the way to go.


Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 103 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3