I use Warne rings the most; but go with the STEEL rings vs. ALUMINUM. You will gain a bit of weight here (which will help reduce "felt recoil")
BUT that is a GOOD thing! Especially with these heavy recoiling calibers. If you have seen high speed photos of a heavy recoiling handgun, you would be amazed at the amount of FLEXING a scope tube actually does; thus another good reason to use FOUR rings instead of TWO: it reduces the length of scope tube in between the rings that can FLEX...
PLUS
you will also gain STRENGTH. And of course that is a GOOD THING.
SChunter and I are on the same page here.
PS: Oh, and did I mention that scope tube FLEXING can cause internal scope tube malfunctions???...I post this for the "two rings is enough crowd" only to share what I have personally experienced. We all tend to do what works for us; thus I share.
Maybe another way to put it is this: when I am guiding handgun hunters (which I have been doing yearly in pretty good numbers since 1987) and I know that we are already "at a disadvantage due to the chosen weapon," maybe I look at it a little more seriously because I am a firm believer in "Murphy's Law;" ('cuz I have seen it happen over and over again..._YES I am talking about scope failure on the hunt_and I only want my hunters to succeed.)
Obviously if you are using the scope on the milder recoilers, you don't need to worry as much; but I only throw this out for your information as to my experience.