Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Scope opinions #143439 04/03/2014 4:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 55
G19 Offline OP
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 55
Ok, I have the SBHH and now I need to scope it. With my situation my shots will all be under 100 yds for deer. With a 100 yard limit would you just go with a fixed 2x scope or would you go with a variable scope? Also I see some scopes have a BDC retical, would that be needed or will the .44mag not drop enough in a 100 yards to worry about it? I think I seen one load sighted in at 50 yards only dropped about 8.1 inches at 100 yards, i'm thinking just hold over a little. Thanks for any input and next i'll be picking your brains on scope makers.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: G19] #143440 04/03/2014 5:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,861
Franchise Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,861
I have a 4x on my Ruger Super Redhawk & have never needed anything more. I have variables on some of my single shots though. I am not a fan of the BDC reticles myself, but that's just my 10 cents worth. The classic crosshairs work best for me.


The Eyes are Useless, When The Mind Is Blind
Re: Scope opinions [Re: G19] #143441 04/03/2014 5:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 765
wheelguns Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 765
2x would work, but I prefer a 4x, and if you site your gun in zero at 100 yards (depending on load) you would be a couple inches high at 50 and a couple inches low at 125. This way if you had to stretch it a bit there would be less calculations.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: G19] #143442 04/03/2014 5:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
I'd go with an UltraDot but if you want magnification a 2x or 4x would do fine. With a 100 yard zero most 44 loads will be around 2 to 3 inches high at midrange so no need for holdover or BDC.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: s4s4u] #143445 04/03/2014 5:39 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,825
MIHunter Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,825
I would go with a red dot like the Ultra Dot.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: MIHunter] #143446 04/03/2014 5:58 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,669
Chance Weldon Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,669
I wasn't that fond of the 2x power scope I first put on mine. The scope I use now is a Nikon Force XR variable power. It's got a BDC reticle, but I haven't used the holdover markings yet. Haven't shot far enough to really need them.


Formerly TN Lone Wolf

"We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided." - J.K. Rowling
Re: Scope opinions [Re: Chance Weldon] #143447 04/03/2014 6:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,359
SChunter Offline
Shooting Expert
Offline
Shooting Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,359
G19,

Are you planning on using the integral ring mounts for mounting? If so, I would lean towards a fixed power scope for a smaller, lighter version on the forward-mounted design.

That being said, I have a 2x Leupold on a Redhawk, and a Bushnell Elite 2x6 on a FA in .44. I like the magnification of the Bushnell when I want to stretch it out, and it's a smaller overall package than my Leupold or Burris variables.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: SChunter] #143449 04/03/2014 9:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,116
GlennS Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,116
4x Leupold is really hard to beat and they pop up every now and then for decent prices on the used market....For a bargain priced scope that performs exceptionally well, the 4x Weaver is great. Glass is VERY clear and they hold up very well on the FA guns. FA sold them for years and they were highly recommended by them for the heavy kickers.


"Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt"
Re: Scope opinions [Re: GlennS] #143459 04/03/2014 11:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434
H2OBUG Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434
Buy the 2x Leupold Gary has listed on here it is a good deal and lifetime warranty. As well as it may be one of the best handgun scopes you can buy.

BTW I have 2x scopes on my wheel guns.

Mine had a 2x Trophy
http://www.handgunhunt.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=972&ppuser=2724

Last edited by H2OBUG; 04/03/2014 11:39 PM.

If it jams force it! If it breaks it needed replacing anyway.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: H2OBUG] #143460 04/03/2014 11:54 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,596
racksmasher1 Offline
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,596
2X, or the Ultra Dot.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: racksmasher1] #143461 04/04/2014 12:00 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,057
Gary Offline
Distinguished Master
Offline
Distinguished Master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,057
That scope is sold...


You can't wait any longer. Join the NRA and start writing your Congressmen and Senators.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: Gary] #143463 04/04/2014 12:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375
Dan B. Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,375
4x Weaver........have them one both my Hunter models....love them!!


Exodus 20:5-11
Matthew 5:18
Revelation 22:14

ISPBS--Expert Level

Please don't use e-mail, contact me w/ PM.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: Dan B.] #143467 04/04/2014 7:44 AM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 55
G19 Offline OP
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks guys, seems like 2x or 4x is the way to go. Now I just gotta do some hard looking and try to get one ordered this weekend. Bass Pro has a six pay right now and they will send the scope as soon as they take out your first payment.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: G19] #143470 04/04/2014 11:40 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757
cottonstalk Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757
Keep looking around I just picked up a leupold scope,rings and a base for under $200. I have used weaver with no issues as well as bushnell trophy series.


"If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence,try orderin' someone else's dog around" unknown cowboy
Re: Scope opinions [Re: cottonstalk] #143480 04/04/2014 5:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
KRal Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
I will add that if you're planning to take advantage of the Hunter design and think of using irons by tipping off the scope; be selective on scope length. Some scopes are to long to fit between the sights and will require higher rings than what is supplied. The fixed powered leupold's will not be an issue. The 2x Burris will require higher rings or remove rear sight. I think the weaver's require the same, but can't remember for sure. Dan B. should be able to confirm the weavers. If you require the higher rings, all you have to do is call ruger and tell them the issue; then just mail them yours and they will do an even swap.


It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: KRal] #143481 04/04/2014 5:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 55
G19 Offline OP
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 55
 Originally Posted By: KRal
I will add that if you're planning to take advantage of the Hunter design and think of using irons by tipping off the scope; be selective on scope length. Some scopes are to long to fit between the sights and will require higher rings than what is supplied. The fixed powered leupold's will not be an issue. The 2x Burris will require higher rings or remove rear sight. I think the weaver's require the same, but can't remember for sure. Dan B. should be able to confirm the weavers. If you require the higher rings, all you have to do is call ruger and tell them the issue; then just mail them yours and they will do an even swap.


Thank you for the heads up. I will have to keep this in mind when looking. If Ruger will do an even swap that won't be a bad thing either.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: G19] #143497 04/05/2014 3:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,205
KYODE Offline
Shooting Expert
Offline
Shooting Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,205
I have 2x burris on my redhawk and bisley hunter. Both have factory supplied rings with sights still on.


Kentucky….no place like home.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: KYODE] #143502 04/05/2014 4:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
KRal Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
 Originally Posted By: KYODE
I have 2x burris on my redhawk and bisley hunter. Both have factory supplied rings with sights still on.


But is your iron sights zeroed or screwed all the way down? My Burris would fit with the rear sight bottomed out. I prefered having my irons zeroed.


It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: KRal] #143505 04/05/2014 4:51 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 435
BINGO Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 435
Mine had to have the sight bottomed out w/a T/C 2X But not w/a Japanese made Nikon Monarch 2X if I remember right. I like the older Nikon's more than the present offering. Still looking for a used one to replace the one I sold. The new models seem to have a larger ocular housing. Friend just bought one for his Hunter but we haven't mounted it yet. I also have a Bushnell 2-6X Firefly. Great optic but it narrows the field of view.

Re: Scope opinions [Re: BINGO] #143508 04/05/2014 8:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,205
KYODE Offline
Shooting Expert
Offline
Shooting Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,205
Yep.....bottomed out. I started to post that but limited my typing on the phone lol. I never shoot unscoped so it works here.


Kentucky….no place like home.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: G19] #143514 04/05/2014 2:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
As soon as I got my Hunter I called ruger and they swapped out the rings for extra high so I didn't have to worry about the sights. I prefer higher rings on handguns anyway.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: racksmasher1] #143653 04/08/2014 10:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 920
billa Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 920
I would go with the Bushnell 2 - 6 elite scope. For woods hunting I like 2x but the extra magnification will come in handy for smaller targets at longer range. My 44 mag sight in rule is 2 inches high at 50 yards = just a bit low at 100.


"Therefore go and make disciples of all nations,... "
Matthew 28:19

Handgun hunter since 1979 - haven't used a rifle since!
HHI member #992, NRA, SCI.
Re: Scope opinions [Re: billa] #143666 04/08/2014 4:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 66
whywait Offline
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 66
According to Leupold's site the 2x only has 1.7 actual magnification. It helps as far as just using crosshairs for a sight picture, but a red dot will be just as good. I recommend a good 4x or a variable. I have Leupolds and Bushnell elites but they usually stay around the 4x setting.


Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 100 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3