|
S&W 329 4" Scandium
#182156
07/25/2017 8:20 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 33
SnookNTarpon
OP
newbie
|
OP
newbie
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 33 |
Been looking for a lighter hunting revolver than what i have now (6.5" and 7.5" 629). Looked long and hard at Bisley's in 41 mag with 5.5" barrels but i am too used to the N frames after shooting these for 25 years. The 329, while it has a shorter barrel than i owuld like, could be a possibility. Weighs about half of my 629s...
Anyone shoot these with 240 gr loads @1350ish?
any feedback appreciated. thanks SnT
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: SnookNTarpon]
#182157
07/25/2017 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,556
junebug
Gun Slinger
|
Gun Slinger
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,556 |
Get a good shooting glove,hang on . They will be ------twitchie. The recoil will be faster and harder.When you give up that much weight the recoil impulses speed up and go up.
junebug
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: junebug]
#182158
07/26/2017 12:53 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,048
wvhitman
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,048 |
I've shot a friends. As Junebug says, fast, hard recoil( from the light weight), more difficult to shoot accurately with any load, especially if you try to rush shots. All in all, not a very shooter friendly gun. My 5" Redhawk may weigh a bit more, but far easier to shoot.
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: junebug]
#182159
07/26/2017 12:53 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,006
Zee
Shooting Expert
|
Shooting Expert
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,006 |
I've shot one with my max 240gr XTP loads and hot 325gr WFN-GC bear loads.
It's exceptionally brisk in recoil. Not a range gun. Not really what I would consider a hunting gun either.
It's a carry gun in my book.
Wasn't really a fan.
"To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: Zee]
#182163
07/26/2017 2:12 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434
H2OBUG
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434 |
I had one for about a week. Purchased it new with the intent of using its as a carry side arm. It worked great as a carry gun but when you shot it it would send small particles of the bullet jacket back into your face via the little SS deflector strip.
So I sent it back to S&W they claimed they recut the forcing cone and replaced and retimed the cylinder.
So I shot it maybe another 12 rounds and after cleaning the copper bits out of my face. I returned the gun to the store I bought it from and they refunded my money.
So in short unless they have improved their product quality on the old 329 I would shoot it prior to purchase.
If it jams force it! If it breaks it needed replacing anyway.
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: H2OBUG]
#182174
07/26/2017 2:56 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 33
SnookNTarpon
OP
newbie
|
OP
newbie
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 33 |
Wow.
worse than i expected. Maybe take another look at teh bisley... Thanks everyone SnT
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: SnookNTarpon]
#182182
07/26/2017 7:12 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 97
N-Frame
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 97 |
Have you given any thought to the S&W 69? I don't own one, but I'm looking.
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: N-Frame]
#182183
07/26/2017 8:23 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434
H2OBUG
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,434 |
The 69 or the old 696 in 44 spl would be a great gun. Its interesting to me that the newer 69 is rated for the 44mag and not the 44 spl.
If it jams force it! If it breaks it needed replacing anyway.
|
|
|
Re: S&W 329 4" Scandium
[Re: H2OBUG]
#182184
07/26/2017 9:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 463
AK hgunner1
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 463 |
Ouch is all I can say....Better you than me....
Charlie
Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the sons of GOD
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
92
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|