Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets #191674 04/05/2018 9:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
az_shooter Offline OP
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
All,

I just became aware of a proposed rule change to R12-4-303 that defines unlawful devices, methods and ammunition for the taking of game in Arizona. Currently R12-4-303 A.1.b reads:

1. An individual shall not use any of the following to take
wildlife:

b. Tracer, armor-piercing, or full-jacketed ammunition designed for military use


The updated rule would read:

1. A person shall not use any of the following to take
wildlife:

b. Tracer, armor-piercing, or full-jacketed bullets that are not designed to expand upon impact


The words "for military use" are being removed.

I have written to the commission highlighting that the proposed change may outlaw some non-expanding handgun bullets that are best suited for the taking of large game (elk, bear, buffalo), including Punch Bullets and Barnes Buster.

Please contact the AZ Game and Fish Dept. before April 15th and ask for additional clarification be included in the rule to allow for the above mentioned bullets. In addition, they need to be educated on the fact that non-expanding bullets are indeed a humane option for the taking of large game, that they are often more humane than the expanding variety.

Contact Information:

All public comments about the proposed rulemaking can be made by the following methods:

E-mail: rulemaking@azgfd.gov, or jcook@azgfd.gov.
U.S. Mail: Arizona Game and Fish Department, Attn.: Jay Cook, Regional Supervisor FOR6, 7200 E. University Drive, Mesa, AZ 85207.
Telephone: Jay Cook, Regional Supervisor FOR6, (480) 324-3540.

Additional details:

https://www.azgfd.com/reminder-public-co...-ends-april-15/

Re: Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets [Re: az_shooter] #191676 04/05/2018 11:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
jamesfromjersey Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,715
Thank`s for the heads up........


Life member-NRA-SCI
Member-HHI #2900-HHASA #067
Colt-Ruger-Freedom Arms-and S&W Collector Assoc.s
"I have more guns then I need but not as many as I want" "Handgun hunters HAVE to be good"
Re: Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets [Re: jamesfromjersey] #191682 04/06/2018 2:58 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,556
junebug Offline
Gun Slinger
Offline
Gun Slinger
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,556
So how would they word it to allow punch bullets or Barnes busters and not allow someone to use a round nosed bullet like a 45 acp 230 gr round nose. The round nosed slug would whistle right on thru and be a very poor choice. Would you have to specify a me plat size for the bullet?


junebug
Re: Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets [Re: junebug] #191692 04/06/2018 12:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
KRal Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,963
In my opinion, we don't need laws governing what bullets or calibers, we as hunters, should use. Instead, focus should be on education of what works and what don't. We have enough government in our lives now regulating what we can and can't do.


It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.
Re: Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets [Re: KRal] #191694 04/06/2018 1:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Originally Posted By: KRal
In my opinion, we don't need laws governing what bullets or calibers, we as hunters, should use. Instead, focus should be on education of what works and what don't. We have enough government in our lives now regulating what we can and can't do.


Agreed. But it seems there are enough morons out there to screw it up for the rest of us.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets [Re: junebug] #191695 04/06/2018 2:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097
jwp475 Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,097
 Originally Posted By: junebug
So how would they word it to allow punch bullets or Barnes busters and not allow someone to use a round nosed bullet like a 45 acp 230 gr round nose. The round nosed slug would whistle right on thru and be a very poor choice. Would you have to specify a me plat size for the bullet?


Believe it or not but I?ve seen antelope shot with 45 ball Ammo and it leaves a full caliber hole.

The ATF considers the punch bullet a hollow point. There are no handgun bullets sold in the U. S. that does not meet in the legal definition of an expanding bullet.


Re: Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets [Re: jwp475] #191696 04/06/2018 2:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 430
Craig44 Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 430
I don't know, you probably have a lot of dummies out there using surplus 7.62x39 on deer. I think they are who these regulations are aimed at.

I've seen .45 hardball pass through critters and leave a tiny hole. Hardball sucks, regardless of size.

Re: Arizona might outlaw non-expanding hunting bullets [Re: Craig44] #191842 04/10/2018 10:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 508
Badubet Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 508
Silly to think a .512 caliber hard cast bullet will not dispatch an animal without undue suffering


Erotica is using a feather, pornography is using the whole chicken

Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 90 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3