Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
6.8 SPC #18500 01/27/2007 4:41 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 51
Encore307 Offline OP
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 51
Has anybody used this cartridge yet and if so what is the perfomance like on deer size game or even on varmints . I'm thinking of buying a new barrel.

Re: 6.8 SPC [Re: Encore307] #18501 01/27/2007 6:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
ranger140892 Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
We received several M4's in 6.8 back in 02 for testing. I liked it. We shot it out to 800m with scopes and most of them held around 1.5 moa. More than good enough for it's intended target. I don't remember much about the trajectory but it sure had one.
I wouldn't want a handgun for deer hunting in that cartridge though. There's just too many better cartridges out there.

Re: 6.8 SPC [Re: ranger140892] #18502 01/28/2007 12:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
Quote:

There's just too many better cartridges out there.




Agreed!


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 6.8 SPC [Re: Encore307] #18503 01/28/2007 5:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 402
jim257 Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 402
kinda one of those cartridges that doesnt do anything special,or fill any voids.although the american public will buy anything...when the 260 remington came out it was the gun to be had until people discovered it was a clone of the 7mm-08!
ive noticed the trend of new numbers on the cases with no more performance than old numbers on old cases.
in the encore my choice for a standard chambering would be the 7mm-08,and the 7-30 waters or the 30-30 ai in the contender.


get-r-done
Re: 6.8 SPC [Re: jim257] #18504 01/28/2007 10:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
ranger140892 Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Jim, I agree with you on the 260 Rem. I couldn't wait to build one. I built a beautiful rifle and was planning on building an XP in 260. After finding out how finicky it is and that it doesn't come close to living up to the hype, I changed my mind on the XP. Bullet choice is what confuses me. Most available bullets are ridiculously long and heavy for this caliber. I do have a couple of really good loads for the rifle, though not as fast as advertised. One deer load for my wife and a coyote load. When the throat shows wear, I'll rebarrel to 7mm-08. Sorry about getting so far off topic. The 260 is a bit of a sore spot for me.

Re: 6.8 SPC [Re: Encore307] #18505 01/30/2007 4:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
pab1 Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
Coyote Guns offers a barrel with the shoulder bumped forward. They say you this will give you 100-150 fps more out of a 14" barrel.
Coyote Guns


Experience is the best teacher, hunger good sauce.
Osborne Russell Journal of a Trapper


Re: 6.8 SPC [Re: pab1] #18506 01/30/2007 7:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
ranger140892 Offline
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
In 260 or 6.8?

Got it. I just checked their sight. I've done that for a few belted mag rifles I've built so guys could get better headspace off the shoulder instead of the belt.
Quote:

Coyote Guns offers a barrel with the shoulder bumped forward. They say you this will give you 100-150 fps more out of a 14" barrel.
Coyote Guns



Last edited by ranger140892; 01/30/2007 7:41 PM.

Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 114 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3