Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Semi- New Handgunner #53187 07/18/2009 7:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
Gentlemen,

I am looking to try the handgun hunting thing agin. I am a lot more serious this time though.
As soon as I can sell my 1000 yd. rifle I will be purchasing a new revolver. I am leaning toward the Ruger brand.I will be hunting elk, mule deer,antelope and possibly a moose with it. Would like to reach out to at least 100 yds.

My question that I figure the wealth of knowledge on here will be able to answer is what caliber and what barrel length? I am not recoil sensitive. I have had a Ruger SBH Bisley and a Taurus Raging bull both in 44 and I was casting a 336 grn. semi wadcutter GC. It shot well in the Taurus.

Thanks In Advance,

Rich

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53189 07/18/2009 8:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
Well, if you want a factory revolver and 100 yards is your max range a Ruger SRH in .480 would be a good choice. The same gun in .454 Casull would pack a little more punch but also comes with a significant recoil increase. I prefer a single action and the Ruger Bisley in 45 Long Colt, loaded hot, is one of my faves.

There are many more options in the singleshots like the T/C Contender, the .375 Winny is a great all-around game getter.

It all depends on the format you want to use.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: s4s4u] #53190 07/18/2009 9:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
Thank You.

I would prefer to stay with a revolver for the traditional part of it and a single action would be even better. I have looked at the SRH in 454 with the 9.5 barrel or the SBH 44 with 10.5 barrel. I haven't seen any SRH offered in a 480. The longer barrels seem more appealing to me. Must be the longrange in me.

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53192 07/18/2009 11:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
Any Thoughts on revolver barrel length?

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53193 07/18/2009 11:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Mack Daddy Offline
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
I prefer the Ruger in 480.A lead semi wadcutter or wadcutter will cut a very good wound channel to put down your game.350gr to 375gr. Ijust started moulding my own.I live in Oregon

Mack Daddy


WHINNERS DON'T WIN
AND
WINNERS DON'T WHINE
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: Mack Daddy] #53194 07/18/2009 11:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Mack Daddy Offline
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
My 7and a half works fine.I might cut it down to 6 inch.I crawl to my shooting site.(double amputee)

Mack Daddy


WHINNERS DON'T WIN
AND
WINNERS DON'T WHINE
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: Mack Daddy] #53195 07/19/2009 1:07 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
I have heard good things about the 480, but they are a little hard to find at a decent price. Maybe because they don't make them anymore.

I love casting bullets. I got into it shooting cowboy silhouettes and then when I tried BPCRS with a 45-70.

How far is a long shot at your stand Mack Daddy? Will the 480 handle a 150 yd shot with no problem?

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53198 07/19/2009 2:22 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,704
Tigger Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,704
Welcome to HH rlb!!

I have a 480 SRH with the 9.5" barrel and it's a great gun. I also had a 44 SRH with the long barrel, it was a tack driver. I like the long barrels on my revolvers.

For what you describe either the 480 or 454 SRH will do the job. I think a 150 yard shot is starting to push the limits of both cartridges without lots of practice and a decent power scope. Long range is not a mystery, but it takes a lot of practice and a good knowledge of what your gun can do.


NRA Life Member



** NEVER! Moon a Werewolf!!**
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53200 07/19/2009 2:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Originally Posted By: rlb
Any Thoughts on revolver barrel length?


With the Ruger SRH I like the 9-1/2" barrel, it just looks and balances better to me on that frame plus you get little more velocity. If you peruse the auctions you will find a few 480's for sale although the long barrel is a little harder to find. If you got the dough and like horsepower, a 5-hole conversion of a 45LC Bisley or SBH to .454 might just be your answer.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: s4s4u] #53201 07/19/2009 2:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655
wapitirod Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,655
if your wanting to hunt elk with a single action I'd suggest the BFR, it's basicly an extended ruger and much less than a FA or custom but with a lot more whoop ass than the the 44 or 45. I had one in 45-70 and it was a monster, I could run 440gr hard cast to almost 1700fps which will blow through any elk. I personally am a fan of the 475 and 500 linebaughs but you will have to go custom or FA although magnum research does build a bfr in 475. I almost forgot barrel length, I prefer 6" to 8" on my single actions, the longer the barrel the longer your sight radius and the more accurate you can be with open sights but just as an example of what you can do with a 6" here is a group I shot @ 100yds with my 475 before my wrist blew up.




Last edited by wapitirod; 07/19/2009 2:51 AM.

I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. John Wayne-The Shootist


Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: wapitirod] #53214 07/19/2009 4:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
Well as soon as the longrange rifle goes, then I think I will look for a 454 or a 480 SRH. I might be wrong, wouldn't be the first time, but I think it will take care of anything I need it for.

Thanks guys for all the input.

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: wapitirod] #53217 07/19/2009 5:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
pab1 Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
I agree with Wapitirod on the BFR. If you like SA handguns, the BFR is a great choice. I have one in .454 Casull, which is the shorter version, and it has become my favorite revolver.


Experience is the best teacher, hunger good sauce.
Osborne Russell Journal of a Trapper


Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: pab1] #53233 07/19/2009 7:21 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
The more I look at the 454 data the more I think that I like it. I think it will take down anything I wish to hunt. The BFR is a fine looking weapon and it might be a next gun. I can have a SRH 9 1/2 in 454 here for $655 so I think that will be the first to get started with. I can upgrade later.

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: wapitirod] #53264 07/20/2009 7:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,222
bisleyfan44 Offline
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,222
I love Ruger's Bisley myself; have one in 41 that can flat out shoot. Like the Ruger Hunter as well; gives almost instant option of using iron sights or optics.

If you have the money to do so and the inclination, I'd recommend a Freedom Arms revolver. You can't buy a better revolver, period. It's as close to being perfect as a human can build it. Any caliber you wish to have and built to last more than a few lifetimes.


I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a handgun today.
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: bisleyfan44] #53269 07/21/2009 12:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
Yes I had a Bisley and about the third time it bloodied my middle knuckle I took it back and got the Taurus Raging Bull. Much better to shoot and a bit more accurate. I know you didn't want to hear that part, but it shot about half the size of groups the Bisley did.

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53287 07/21/2009 2:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Quote:
it shot about half the size of groups the Bisley did


It's all in how you hold it.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: s4s4u] #53288 07/21/2009 3:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
Maybe it's the odd hand syndrome. Every time I pulled the trigger on the Bisley it would bite the second knuckle on my middle finger. Didn't like that much.

I was getting 1/2" at 50 yds with the hornady 265 444 bullet. I still don't really know why I got rid of it. Maybe if I hadn't I wouldn't be here in good company.

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53295 07/21/2009 9:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 126
rawhide kid Offline
member
Offline
member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 126
If you liked the Taurus, why not stick with it? I also found the Raging Bull more comfortable to shoot in .454 cal than any of the others. To me it is just a shame they are so big physically. I had the 6inch ported .44 and it too was a tack driver, but I felt like I was wearing a cannon. The same weight and size is probly why they are so comfortable to shoot but with smallish hands I just felt acward with them.


NRA LIFE MEMBER, Retired Air Force: SS Ruger Bisley 5.5 45LC, EAA Witness 38Supr, S&W 625 Mnt Gun in 45LC
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: wapitirod] #53297 07/21/2009 1:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
 Originally Posted By: wapitirod
if your wanting to hunt elk with a single action I'd suggest the BFR, it's basicly an extended ruger and much less than a FA or custom but with a lot more whoop ass than the the 44 or 45. I had one in 45-70 and it was a monster, I could run 440gr hard cast to almost 1700fps which will blow through any elk. I personally am a fan of the 475 and 500 linebaughs but you will have to go custom or FA although magnum research does build a bfr in 475. I almost forgot barrel length, I prefer 6" to 8" on my single actions, the longer the barrel the longer your sight radius and the more accurate you can be with open sights but just as an example of what you can do with a 6" here is a group I shot @ 100yds with my 475 before my wrist blew up.





I agree completely with Rod. If it must be a single action, look no further than BFR. The .475 is a fine choice for any animal that walks this planet. You can also get one in .500 JRH if you want an even bigger hole. BFR is hard to beat for the money.......


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: rlb] #53305 07/21/2009 7:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,222
bisleyfan44 Offline
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,222
 Originally Posted By: rlb
Yes I had a Bisley and about the third time it bloodied my middle knuckle I took it back and got the Taurus Raging Bull. Much better to shoot and a bit more accurate. I know you didn't want to hear that part, but it shot about half the size of groups the Bisley did.



To each, their own. I've never had a bisley bite me. And every one I've shot proved to be very accurate. It's all in the way you hold it. Bowen, Gallagher, Clements, etc all use the bisley frame on their BIG guns for a reason.

On the other hand, I've had pretty much the opposite luck with Taurus products. Nothing wrong with their designs and their accuracy was OK, but half the time they wouldn't work because something broke, fell off, etc. One was a 44 RB. And good luck dealing with Taurus and warranty work.

I know you'll find something to fill your needs. All the recommendations above are excellent ones from those with experience. Good luck in your search and welcome to the forum.


I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a handgun today.
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: bisleyfan44] #53328 07/22/2009 1:59 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
well maybe someone here can instruct me how to hold them corectly. See, when I get ahold of it my second knuckle lines up perfectly right behind the trigger gaurd and it's a rather big knuckle. Maybe even a little bigger now after being beat up by the Bisley. I guess if I am going to shoot a 454, 475 or 480 I need to learn.

Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: bisleyfan44] #53329 07/22/2009 2:45 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,057
Gary Offline
Distinguished Master
Offline
Distinguished Master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,057
Rich, You've gotten some good advice here. If you've never shot a 454 or larger you may be in for a surprise. The recoil is manageable but it does take some getting used too and lots of practice. Personally I think the 454 will easily kill anything you mentioned with the correct bullet and proper shot placement. If you have the money and want the best go with a freedom arms 454 and you won't be disappointed. BFR's shoot well from my experience but the Ruger Super Blackhawk grip style can be pretty punishing with full-house loads (just my opinion). The FA is much easier on the shooter. For shots out to 100 yards a 7 1/2 inch barrel is about optimal in my opinion; it will handle well and you still get very good velocity. One other thing to consider is that 454 ammo is pretty easy to come by off-the-shelf and there are some excellent hunting loads available - not so with the 475 or 500 single action chamberings.


You can't wait any longer. Join the NRA and start writing your Congressmen and Senators.
Re: Semi- New Handgunner [Re: Gary] #53331 07/22/2009 3:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
rlb Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 830
Yes. I am trying to take all of this in and pray that someone either comes up with a trade or just buys my rifle so I can get started on this new journey. If I can get what I want out of the rifle I might be able to afford a used FA if I can find one. If not I have been looking at the SRH. It seems to be pretty weighty and may tame a little bit of the recoil. I figured a 9 1/2" barrel might be even better for the recoil end of things not really for the velocity.

I really thank everyone for the help and advice so far and the warm welcome.


Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 100 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3