Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
44 Mag vs. 45 LC #101199 01/24/2012 3:54 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 287
Al in OK Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 287
I know this has probably been a past topic and I hear it argued amongst the brethren handgun enthusiast that I know, But here goes...
Can the 45LC be handloaded to out perform a .44 Mag? I have shot A LOT of 44, but not so many 45LC. Whuddayathunk?


Gun Control - A theory; A belief that a violent predator who ignores the laws prohibiting them from killing their fellow human beings will obey a law telling them they cannot own a gun.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Al in OK] #101200 01/24/2012 3:59 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
It can handily outperform the .429 Magnum at significantly lower pressure levels.


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Whitworth] #101201 01/24/2012 4:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
The 45 has 7.7% more case volume, do the math ;-)

I look at it like getting an extra 10-20 grains of bullet weight, relatively.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: s4s4u] #101202 01/24/2012 4:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 287
Al in OK Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 287
Just found the same topic elsewhere. Like the Linebaugh link.
http://www.customsixguns.com/writings/dissolving_the_myth.htm

Never thought much about it until recent, but it makes sense. I'm not really a recoil junkie, so it might be worth trying out.


Gun Control - A theory; A belief that a violent predator who ignores the laws prohibiting them from killing their fellow human beings will obey a law telling them they cannot own a gun.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Al in OK] #101235 01/24/2012 3:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 58
430RUPE Offline
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 58
Now come on, Clint said theat the .44mag is the most powerful handgun in the world and we know Clint would never lie to use, Right? LOL

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: 430RUPE] #101236 01/24/2012 3:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Ah, but Clint's commentary predates the rebirth of the .45 Colt to superstar status! LOL!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Whitworth] #101283 01/24/2012 8:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
minnesotahunter Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
I am a 45lc fan, and have actually switched from a 44mag sbh, to a 45lc sbhh. And I agree that the 45lc +p type rounds do out perform standard 44mag rounds. For example BB has some 45lc +p loads that will get near 1300ft lbs of energy, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, but this has got to be about max in any standard factory Ruger. In fact these loads can't be shot out of any gun that isn't built at least as strong as a Ruger Large frame revolver.

But....the 44mag +P ammo, that can be shot out of a standard factory large frame Ruger is approaching 1700ft lbs of energy.

So, would it be correct to say that the +p 45lc loads can exeed standard 44mag loads, but are still below the 44mag +p loads?? Or, can a unconverted Ruger 45lc safely push a 340grn slug along at 1500fps?

Don't get mad at me...I'm a 45lc guy myself, but I always wondered about this.

Thanks
MN

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: minnesotahunter] #101286 01/24/2012 8:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
The 335 grain .45 loads I chronographed a couple of weeks ago were averaging 1,365 fps -- in the same ball park as the heavy .44 Mag loads we tested, but the .45 Colt loads are running 20% less pressure -- 30,000 psi versus 36,000 psi. Well within the safety range of a 6-shot Ruger in .45 Colt. Forget muzzle energy. Even 1,700 ft-lbs significantly exceeds the calculated levels of my .500 Linebaugh loads, but I'll let you guess which one is more effective on game!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Whitworth] #101292 01/24/2012 8:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
minnesotahunter Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
Well said. That pretty much sums up why I switched. I believe the 45lc can out perform the 44mag on game, and won't beat you up as bad.

I just meant numbers only....well you get it.

MN

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: minnesotahunter] #101298 01/24/2012 9:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
 Originally Posted By: minnesotahunter
Well said. That pretty much sums up why I switched. I believe the 45lc can out perform the 44mag on game, and won't beat you up as bad.

I just meant numbers only....well you get it.

MN


The .45 Colt just flat-out works!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: minnesotahunter] #101301 01/24/2012 9:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Quote:
I just meant numbers only....well you get it.


How about these numbers.....

I am a busy guy and like things simple. I have a Lyman 55 set to throw 25.1 grains of H110, which it does precisely every time, and will stuff the heaviest slug in front of that charge that will shoot accurately and safely in whatever chambering I am loading at the time. In the .429"er, that would limit me to a 225 grain J-whatever, where in the .452"er I can push a 260 and remain within prescribed limits. That is a significant number when it comes to game.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: s4s4u] #101302 01/24/2012 9:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
 Originally Posted By: s4s4u
 Quote:
I just meant numbers only....well you get it.


How about these numbers.....

I am a busy guy and like things simple. I have my Lyman 55 set to throw 25.1 grains of H110, which it does precisely every time, and will stuff the heaviest slug in front of that charge that will shoot accurately and safely in whatever chambering I am loading at the time. In the .429"er, that would limit me to a 225 grain J-whatever, where in the .452"er I can push a 260 and remain within prescribed limits. That is a significant number when it comes to game.


I like those numbers!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Whitworth] #101305 01/24/2012 9:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
minnesotahunter Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
Right. I get it. With your setup, the 45lc kicks the 44s ass, and I'm cool with that. Like I said, I'm a 45lc guy. Don't even own a 44 anymore.

But, unless you can push a 340 to 1500 safely in a 45lc....you have to admit that by "energy" numbers ONLY, the 44 wins out.

I know, it takes way more pressure and everything else. I'm just sayin.

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: minnesotahunter] #101307 01/24/2012 9:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Yes, but energy numbers are meaningless -- so on paper, some "lesser" cartridges look to be more effective, but in the real world.....you get my drift,


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: minnesotahunter] #101308 01/24/2012 9:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Quote:
But, unless you can push a 340 to 1500 safely in a 45lc....you have to admit that by "energy" numbers ONLY, the 44 wins out.


I'd like to know what gun and what propellant you are getting that out of. And would like to see the chrony screen after you shoot it, and the gun to make sure all six holes are still there without added ventilation ;-)


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: s4s4u] #101309 01/24/2012 9:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
RioHondoHank Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: s4s4u
 Quote:
But, unless you can push a 340 to 1500 safely in a 45lc....you have to admit that by "energy" numbers ONLY, the 44 wins out.


I'd like to know what gun and what propellant you are getting that out of. And would like to see the chrony screen after you shoot it, and the gun to make sure all six holes are still there without added ventilation ;-)


+


Hank

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: RioHondoHank] #101310 01/24/2012 10:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 172
claytonfaulkner Offline
member
Offline
member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 172

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: claytonfaulkner] #101312 01/24/2012 10:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Originally Posted By: claytonfaulkner


I'd like to see it on your chrony screen, not a website's claims. Far be it from a manufacturer to overestimate their wares now.....right ;-)

That is nearly 10% over anything Hodgdon's max data delivers, FWIW.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: claytonfaulkner] #101314 01/24/2012 10:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
RioHondoHank Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: claytonfaulkner


I would like to see at what pressure.


Hank

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: s4s4u] #101321 01/24/2012 11:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 172
claytonfaulkner Offline
member
Offline
member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 172
 Originally Posted By: s4s4u
 Originally Posted By: claytonfaulkner


I'd like to see it on your chrony screen, not a website's claims. Far be it from a manufacturer to overestimate their wares now.....right ;-)

That is nearly 10% over anything Hodgdon's max data delivers, FWIW.


Start a donation pool and I will arrange that.

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Al in OK] #101326 01/24/2012 11:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757
cottonstalk Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,757
 Originally Posted By: Al in OK
Can the 45LC be handloaded to out perform a .44 Mag?


Yes and here is why I say so. The heaviest useful load a 44mag can sling is 320grs(just my opinion). I can sling a 350 @ 1200(handload) and a 360@ 1150(Double Tap load). I run a dozer for a living,and mass moves more than power.Take two tractors one weighing 30,00lbs and 145hp and another weighing 38,000lbs but only has 125hp,the heavier tractor will be more effective pushing bigger objects than the one with more hp. The 45colt has more mass(.429 v/s .452)and (350-360gr v/s 320gr).This is all just my opinion and cost you nothing.


"If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence,try orderin' someone else's dog around" unknown cowboy
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: cottonstalk] #101334 01/24/2012 11:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 486
briarhopper Offline
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 486
cottonstalk, now that is an illustration and a set of numbers that I can relate to, wrap my head around and understand.


If it were supposed to be easy, they'd have sent my little sister to do it.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: claytonfaulkner] #101338 01/25/2012 12:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
I have found that typically, Buffalo Bore's loads exceed the claimed velocities, often by a margin. I don't know what pressures he sees, but I know in some cases, like his 360 grain .454 load, he deliberately loads it to lower levels for reliability's sake, so they don't pull crimp.


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Whitworth] #101340 01/25/2012 12:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,205
KYODE Offline
Shooting Expert
Offline
Shooting Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,205
.......and it all means nothing basically, when it comes to hunting deer etc. they both work about the same. fancy bullets OR factory ammo....you shoot they die.


Kentucky….no place like home.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: KYODE] #101342 01/25/2012 12:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Quote:
you shoot they die


Providing you hit ;-)

But yeah, I agree it is all acedemic in the end.


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: KYODE] #101343 01/25/2012 12:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
pab1 Offline
Distinguished Expert
Offline
Distinguished Expert
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
 Originally Posted By: KYODE
.......and it all means nothing basically, when it comes to hunting deer etc. they both work about the same. fancy bullets OR factory ammo....you shoot they die.


X2!


Experience is the best teacher, hunger good sauce.
Osborne Russell Journal of a Trapper


Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Whitworth] #101347 01/25/2012 12:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Originally Posted By: Whitworth
I have found that typically, Buffalo Bore's loads exceed the claimed velocities, often by a margin. I don't know what pressures he sees, but I know in some cases, like his 360 grain .454 load, he deliberately loads it to lower levels for reliability's sake, so they don't pull crimp.


They must use pixie dust then, or Hodgies has gone soft, 'cause I can't find a 44 load that claims more than 1350 + or - fps with a slug in the 340 range, and I think some of Hodgies chrony numbers are optimistic.

I have a few loads that are over max according to the books, but I wouldn't offer them to another shooter without some kind of disclaimer ;-)


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: s4s4u] #101352 01/25/2012 1:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,725
500WE Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,725
Jeez!!! I don't think I've ever seen this topic discussed before!
Y-a-awwwwnnnn ....

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: 500WE] #101353 01/25/2012 1:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Originally Posted By: 500WE
Jeez!!! I don't think I've ever seen this topic discussed before!
Y-a-awwwwnnnn ....



\:D


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: 500WE] #101365 01/25/2012 1:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
Whitworth Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,836
 Originally Posted By: 500WE
Jeez!!! I don't think I've ever seen this topic discussed before!
Y-a-awwwwnnnn ....


Between naps, tell us how you really feel, Ken! LOL!


Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

BIG IRON: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aXjMH5C30

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: Whitworth] #101372 01/25/2012 2:36 AM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
minnesotahunter Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 808
Yeah, well Dodge pees on Chevy and Ford.
;\)

Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: minnesotahunter] #101374 01/25/2012 2:46 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
s4s4u Offline
Shootist
Offline
Shootist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,608
 Originally Posted By: minnesotahunter
Yeah, well Dodge pees on Chevy and Ford.
;\)


You forgot one....... ;-)


Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.
Re: 44 Mag vs. 45 LC [Re: s4s4u] #101797 01/29/2012 10:29 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 287
Al in OK Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 287
Well,I stayed out of the topic to see what would be said. Chevy, Ford,Tractors.... What? lol. I get it, tho. I think I may try it out. I'm all about real world knock down. Favorite rifle is a 35 Whelen, but it's been getting dusty since I got into Handguns. I started thinking about this because I know the difference in actual knock down energy between .44 and 45 ACP. Shoot an old fridge with .44 = straight thru, 45ACP =knock it down. If I could just get that 45 to reach out a little farther with the same knock down... Thus this obviously over discussed topic. Or will the 45LC be too fast for that type of knock down? I have a hard time with dragging, so I like them to stay put. Shot placement is key, but not always perfect.
;\)


Last edited by Al in OK; 01/30/2012 6:14 PM.

Gun Control - A theory; A belief that a violent predator who ignores the laws prohibiting them from killing their fellow human beings will obey a law telling them they cannot own a gun.

Moderated by  Chance Weldon, Gary, Gregg Richter 

Newest Members
Redhawk41, Striker243, Sxviper, RobbieD, IRONMAN
9668 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
karl 1
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 103 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3