I can't find one of your recent posts that ranted about not believing so-on and so-on, etc. about their bullet performance conclusions, and that you only believed "scientific evidence" like a thorough autopsy like you perform, and that you might get banned for saying so, etc.,; well I can't find it right now but it caused me to look through some of my recovered bullets from animals to find these two:
So just to patronize you sir here are two bullets that killed (on the right, a 295 grain Powerbelt from my 50 caliber muzzleloader rifle that penetrated the onside chest of a big bull elk and smashed out flat on the inside of the opposite shoulder. The other is a 300 grain Nosler partition from my .454 that killed a muley buck.
So...are they "perfect" or are they "perfect failures"?
Or...Not enough evidence??
